GeoIP® accuracy comparison for locations worldwide
The accuracy comparison tool gives you a high level view of the GeoIP City database accuracy. It shows you the percentage of IP addresses correctly located within a particular accuracy radius. If you select a specific country from the options below, you can compare city-level results for the GeoIP City database and GeoLite (the free version of MaxMind's IP geolocation data) within your chosen country, to determine which best fits your goals.
|
Country
|
Correctly located within
25 km
|
Located to a
city, but outside
25 km
|
No
city-level
data available
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Albania | 76% | 23% | 1% |
| Algeria | 48% | 50% | 2% |
| Angola | 83% | 16% | 1% |
| Argentina | 62% | 15% | 23% |
| Armenia | 57% | 4% | 39% |
| Australia | 50% | 46% | 4% |
| Austria | 52% | 35% | 13% |
| Azerbaijan | 72% | 26% | 2% |
| Bahamas | 89% | 10% | 1% |
| Bahrain | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Bangladesh | 49% | 40% | 11% |
| Barbados | 99% | 0% | 1% |
| Belarus | 86% | 13% | 1% |
| Belgium | 56% | 20% | 23% |
| Benin | 82% | 9% | 9% |
| Bermuda | 99% | 0% | 1% |
| Bolivia | 75% | 24% | 0% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 70% | 30% | 0% |
| Brazil | 77% | 23% | 0% |
| Bulgaria | 62% | 37% | 1% |
| Cambodia | 88% | 11% | 2% |
| Cameroon | 74% | 26% | 0% |
| Canada | 67% | 29% | 4% |
| Chile | 60% | 38% | 2% |
| China | 47% | 33% | 21% |
| Colombia | 73% | 25% | 2% |
| Congo (DRC) | 77% | 22% | 1% |
| Costa Rica | 82% | 17% | 0% |
| Croatia | 46% | 45% | 8% |
| Cuba | 96% | 4% | 0% |
| Cyprus | 44% | 56% | 0% |
| Czechia | 52% | 37% | 11% |
| Denmark | 41% | 28% | 31% |
| Dominican Republic | 78% | 21% | 1% |
| Ecuador | 65% | 34% | 0% |
| Egypt | 74% | 17% | 9% |
| El Salvador | 76% | 24% | 1% |
| Estonia | 70% | 29% | 1% |
| Ethiopia | 80% | 20% | 0% |
| Finland | 33% | 24% | 43% |
| France | 43% | 20% | 38% |
| French Polynesia | 60% | 17% | 23% |
| Georgia | 85% | 13% | 2% |
| Germany | 61% | 37% | 2% |
| Ghana | 88% | 11% | 1% |
| Greece | 59% | 32% | 9% |
| Guadeloupe | 81% | 17% | 3% |
| Guam | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Guatemala | 85% | 8% | 8% |
| Guyana | 90% | 8% | 2% |
| Honduras | 63% | 28% | 9% |
| Hong Kong | 27% | 0% | 72% |
| Hungary | 61% | 32% | 8% |
| Iceland | 67% | 16% | 18% |
| India | 56% | 43% | 1% |
| Indonesia | 63% | 34% | 3% |
| Iraq | 80% | 16% | 4% |
| Ireland | 38% | 28% | 33% |
| Israel | 53% | 34% | 13% |
| Italy | 28% | 37% | 35% |
| Ivory Coast | 94% | 4% | 2% |
| Jamaica | 40% | 24% | 36% |
| Japan | 47% | 17% | 36% |
| Jordan | 79% | 10% | 11% |
| Kazakhstan | 81% | 16% | 3% |
| Kenya | 69% | 30% | 2% |
| Kuwait | 92% | 7% | 0% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 91% | 9% | 1% |
| Latvia | 58% | 29% | 13% |
| Lebanon | 75% | 20% | 6% |
| Lithuania | 51% | 35% | 14% |
| Luxembourg | 59% | 7% | 34% |
| Malaysia | 62% | 37% | 1% |
| Maldives | 89% | 8% | 4% |
| Malta | 97% | 2% | 1% |
| Martinique | 88% | 2% | 10% |
| Mauritius | 91% | 7% | 2% |
| Mexico | 64% | 29% | 7% |
| Moldova | 85% | 15% | 1% |
| Mongolia | 96% | 4% | 0% |
| Montenegro | 51% | 49% | 0% |
| Morocco | 58% | 41% | 0% |
| Mozambique | 78% | 20% | 2% |
| Namibia | 81% | 19% | 0% |
| Nepal | 67% | 28% | 5% |
| The Netherlands | 61% | 15% | 24% |
| New Zealand | 55% | 41% | 5% |
| Nicaragua | 88% | 10% | 2% |
| Nigeria | 49% | 51% | 1% |
| North Macedonia | 66% | 33% | 1% |
| Norway | 52% | 32% | 16% |
| Oman | 80% | 20% | 0% |
| Pakistan | 63% | 35% | 1% |
| Panama | 88% | 12% | 0% |
| Paraguay | 78% | 13% | 9% |
| Peru | 58% | 22% | 20% |
| Philippines | 63% | 34% | 3% |
| Poland | 49% | 40% | 11% |
| Portugal | 60% | 32% | 8% |
| Puerto Rico | 47% | 23% | 29% |
| Qatar | 98% | 2% | 0% |
| Réunion | 61% | 30% | 9% |
| Romania | 66% | 33% | 1% |
| Russia | 85% | 12% | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 80% | 20% | 0% |
| Senegal | 93% | 7% | 0% |
| Serbia | 60% | 39% | 0% |
| Singapore | 99% | 0% | 1% |
| Slovakia | 45% | 55% | 0% |
| Slovenia | 55% | 44% | 0% |
| South Africa | 44% | 46% | 9% |
| South Korea | 65% | 23% | 13% |
| Spain | 54% | 29% | 18% |
| Sri Lanka | 53% | 47% | 0% |
| Sweden | 37% | 28% | 36% |
| Switzerland | 51% | 32% | 18% |
| Taiwan | 80% | 14% | 6% |
| Tanzania | 72% | 26% | 1% |
| Thailand | 71% | 28% | 1% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 73% | 27% | 0% |
| Tunisia | 47% | 51% | 2% |
| Türkiye | 58% | 35% | 7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islands | 80% | 20% | 0% |
| Uganda | 92% | 8% | 0% |
| Ukraine | 69% | 25% | 6% |
| United Arab Emirates | 87% | 12% | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 58% | 35% | 7% |
| United States | 52% | 41% | 8% |
| Uruguay | 73% | 25% | 2% |
| Uzbekistan | 70% | 28% | 1% |
| Venezuela | 69% | 30% | 1% |
| Vietnam | 61% | 37% | 2% |
| Zambia | 92% | 8% | 1% |
| Zimbabwe | 80% | 20% | 0% |
Notes:
- Accuracy is calculated by checking known web user IP address and location pairs against the data within MaxMind's GeoIP City and GeoLite City database offerings.
- Due to the nature of geolocation technology and other factors beyond our control, we cannot guarantee any specific future accuracy level.
- Fewer countries are available for cellular and IPv6 IPs due to limited test data.
- GeoLite’s limitations make it unsuitable for commercial-grade applications. See why in this side-by-side comparison of GeoLite and GeoIP.
What's the difference between the GeoIP web services and databases?
MaxMind's IP geolocation data is available in two primary delivery methods: as a downloadable database and as a web service, which is accessed via an API. The GeoIP databases allow users to locally host and utilize the downloadable databases for their applications. The GeoIP web services, delivering our most comprehensive GeoIP data available, are hosted, maintained, and updated regularly on secure MaxMind servers.
Looking for more than just city-level data?
Our web services provide IP geolocation and network data such as country, region, city, ZIP/postal code, anonymizer type, user count, confidence factors, static IP score, and more.
Accurate IP geolocation with emphasis on security and privacy
Ever wondered how we strike the right balance? Our Safer IP geolocation with MaxMind blog post shares insights into achieving geolocation accuracy while upholding security and privacy.